RSPB
Print page

Complaints against the RSPB rejected

Last modified: 17 January 2015

Avocet flying over pools at Minsmere

Image: David Tipling

You may have seen that we have come under concerted attack from some quarters in the national press in recent months.

You may also have read that the Countryside Alliance and 'You Forgot the Birds' – an organisation linked to shooting interests and fronted by Sir Ian Botham – made two formal complaints through the Charity Commission about our charitable work.

We felt it important you should know that neither complaint was upheld by the Charity Commission. We welcome the fact that these attacks have been systematically rejected. We will continue to play a proper role in campaigning for nature in the wider countryside and speaking out against wildlife crime.

The RSPB was not subject to a formal investigation, but the Charity Commission have invested time in examining our processes and activities in the light of the complaints. The Commission are clear that the RSPB has not breached charitable regulations or guidelines, or our own charitable objectives, on any of the issues raised.  

We felt it important you should know that neither complaint was upheld by the Charity Commission.

The RSPB always seeks best practice , and we have welcomed the opportunity to learn all that we can from the guidance offered by our regulator.  We were complimented by the Charity Commission for the speed and thoroughness of our uptake of their advice.

Transparency and accountability are important to us. So we wanted you to see for yourself the allegations, our response and the Charity Commission’s ruling.  We trust that this provides both confirmation and reassurance that the RSPB operates according to the highest standards.     

Here are the formal complaints made by 'You Forgot the Birds' and the Countryside Alliance, our responses and the Charity Commission responses in full.

These documents show clearly the challenges we face, the calibre of our responses and that the RSPB has nothing to hide. 

Solid track record

We welcome scrutiny of our position and practices. We have a solid track record of results based on sound science and good governance. We will always robustly challenge unfounded allegations from unaccountable interests both via our regulators and through answering enquiries from the media.

Thanks to the support of people like you – our members, partners and supporters – the RSPB is an effective organisation. It is understandable that, when we challenge the actions of others, they will seek to undermine us.  

As we forge ahead with our conservation work and grow support through our Giving Nature a Home Campaign, we are likely to face renewed challenges from particular interests.

When we do, you can rest assured that the RSPB’s activity will conform with the legislation and guidelines upheld by the Charity Commission (and its counterparts in Scotland and Northern Ireland) and with our charitable objects, which you can read here.   

We have been both grateful for, and touched by, the support we have received from so many of you during this period. Globally, nationally and locally wildlife is in trouble.

Someone has to be prepared to speak out for nature and, with your help, that is exactly what we are going to carry on doing.