June, 2017

Our work

Our work
You might be surprised to read that our work is far broader than nature reserves and Big Garden Birdwatch. Read more about what else we do.

Saving Species

The need for species conservation has never been greater. Despite notable successes in improving the fortunes of a number of bird species, more are being forced onto the list of those that need attention, both globally and in the UK. If we want to have a
  • Organising the UK-wide hen harrier Survey in 2016

    Blog by Simon Wotton, Senior Conservation Scientist, RSPB Centre for Conservation Science

    Today we are releasing the result of the fifth complete national survey for hen harriers, which was carried out across the UK and the Isle of Man in 2016.

    The last national survey of this UK red-listed species of conservation concern was in 2010, when the population was estimated at 662 territorial pairs (95% confidence intervals giving a range of 576–770) this was an 18% decline in the population between 2004 and 2010.


    Image: The trends in numbers of territorial pairs from the first national survey in 1988/89 to 2016, in England, Northern Ireland, Wales and the Isle of Man

    Image: The trends in numbers of territorial pairs from the first national survey in 1988/89 to 2016, in Scotland and the UK

    The aims of this new survey were to: 

    • provide updated estimates of population size;
    • identify trends since the last survey, nationally and regionally;
    • provide data for further analyses of drivers of change in the hen harrier population.

    This new survey shows that hen harrier population has suffered a decline of 88 pairs (13%) over the past six years with a total UK population estimated to be 545 pairs. Scotland remains the stronghold for UK hen harriers with an estimated 460 pairs in 2016, around 80 per cent of the UK population. You can read more about the results here.

    In this blog I want to share the story of the work that led to these result. Because organising a full national survey of a (potentially) wide-ranging species across the UK does take a lot of time, and it is so much more than analysing the results and producing a final report.

    Photo: Hen harrier  female in flight, image by Mark Thomas (rspb-images.com) 

    Planning a national survey
    Before planning can even start, we need to make sure funding is agreed with one or more of the statutory agencies and, in with some other surveys, other governmental agencies and local authorities. We then need to define the breeding range that we need to survey and that involves requesting and collating data from a number of sources, and discussions with other groups. This discussion continues when much of the fieldwork is being carried out by volunteers, in the case of the hen harrier survey this is mainly though raptor study groups.

    For this national survey we needed some paid field staff and this started in December. As we recruit staff we also have to arrange for hire vehicles, accommodation, risk assessments and other Health & Safety arrangements

    For this survey, planning began in Sept 2015 and involved a number of survey partners. We defined, the survey area, which is the species current known breeding range, at the 10km square level, using results of the last survey and the Bird Atlas 2007-11 (data from BTO), in consultation within the RSPB, with the statutory conservation agencies, other organisations, and with raptor and upland bird study groups for their knowledge and details from the “core areas” that they usually monitor.

    In Scotland (which holds the bulk of the UK’s hen harriers), the survey was organised by the RSPB, the Scottish Raptor Study Group (SRSG) and Scottish Natural Heritage. As the survey area in Scotland is too large to be able fully to cover in an annual survey like this, it is necessary to follow a robust sampling protocol. Each 10km square in the survey area was classified as belonging to one of two different categories so that the sampling approach is more efficient, based on recent records and habitat suitability. Survey coverage was organised in coordination with the SRSG and their members and other volunteers selected their 10km squares for coverage. From the remaining 10km squares, a stratified random selection of squares was surveyed by six RSPB fieldworkers. Within each category, a similar proportion of squares were randomly selected within each region to ensure that robust population estimates could be produced.

    Elsewhere, we achieved comprehensive coverage within the Hen Harrier range in England, Wales, Northern Ireland and the Isle of Man. In England, coverage of suitable habitat in the potential range (mainly) across northern England was mainly carried out by raptor and upland bird study groups affiliated to the Northern England Raptor Forum, other upland bird study groups, and staff and volunteers from Natural England (NE) and RSPB. Additionally, any records reported through the RSPB Hen Harrier Hotline or the Moorland Association protocol with NE, were incorporated following appropriate validation. In Wales, comprehensive coverage of all of the 10km squares in the defined breeding range was carried out by two fieldworkers employed by RSPB, raptor study group members, and staff and volunteers from RSPB and Natural Resources Wales. In Northern Ireland, comprehensive coverage of the 10km squares in the defined breeding range was carried out by members of the Northern Ireland Raptor Study Group (NIRSG). RSPB provided additional funding to the NIRSG to ensure that more remote areas in Northern Ireland were fully surveyed in 2016. There was full coverage on the Isle of Man, with most of the surveying undertaken by a fieldworker who was joint-funded by Manx BirdLife and RSPB.

    Photo: Male Hen Harrier, by Andy Hay (rspb-images.com) 

    The fieldwork
    The field surveys followed the same methods used in the previous national hen harrier surveys, taking place between late March and the end of July. Suitable habitat for hen harrier is moorland, both heather and grass dominated, and upland young forest and we surveyed all such habitat within each 10-km square. In particular, observers were alerted to the possibility of birds nesting within closed mature coniferous forest, and to consider such areas as suitable habitat. Surveys were conducted through a combination of searches and scanning suitable habitat from appropriate vantage points. If a survey square contained a lot of potentially suitable habitat for breeding harriers, it could take three to four days to complete one visit, particularly in some of the more remote areas in Scotland. Survey forms were sent out to all participants, based on the forms used in previous surveys. It’s important to say that all fieldworkers have the proper licences from the appropriate statutory agencies. An important part of my job during the survey is to keep in touch with other fieldworkers, and it is always good to hear about their sightings, either of harriers, or other interesting bird and mammal sightings.

    I carried out some of the fieldwork myself, on Orkney, in the Flow Country and in mid Wales. It was fantastic to be able to spend some time surveying, and finding hen harriers, on Orkney, where there are the highest densities of breeding harriers in the UK, and in the remote wilderness of the Flow Country. I wasn’t as lucky in Wales where I wasn’t able to find any harriers during my surveys.

    Fieldwork can be very tiring, but for me the real hard work was just about to start at the end of season. There is a lot more work to do as I received all of the completed survey forms by the end of 2016. I entered all the data into a survey database and mapped on to a GIS system, and that’s when, for the first time, I can define the final number of ‘confirmed’, ‘probable’ and ‘possible’ hen harrier territories in each survey square, and then to produce the final population estimates by country and also by Scottish regions.
    It is great to be able to share the results of this important survey. The next stage now is to produce a full report on the paper, which we will aim to publish in Bird Study later in the year.

    The survey would not have been possible without the dedication of the members of the raptor and upland bird study groups across the UK as well as volunteers and staff from RSPB and the statutory authorities. Thanks go to all the Scottish Raptor Study Group, the Northern England Raptor Forum, the Northern Ireland Raptor Study Group and all other raptor and upland bird study groups in England and Wales who helped to organise and took part in the survey, and to the RSPB fieldworkers. Thanks go to landowners and estate managers for access arrangements. Thanks to SNH, RSPB and NRW for funding the survey.

  • Bee-eaters are back in town!

    Credit RSPB

    Seven bee-eaters have been found at a quarry in Nottinghamshire, raising hopes that they might breed.

    They were first spotted yesterday (25 June) at East Leake Cemex Quarry. The birds have already drawn a crowd, and a viewing area and car park has been set up for birders seeking the best views of the birds. This can be found at Lings Farm, LE12 6RG.

    Colourful and unmistakable, bee-eaters are rare visitors to the UK and normally nest in southern Europe. The last time they nested in the UK was 2015, when two pairs set up home in a quarry in Cumbria. They have also nested on the Isle of Wight (2014), Herefordshire (2005) and Country Durham (2002). These beautiful birds may stay for the next couple of months should they breed.

    Mark Thomas from the RSPB said: “We are delighted to confirm that seven bee-eaters are currently making themselves at home in East Leake, Nottinghamshire. The birds have been seen mating, so it’s likely they will nest here.

    “Bee-eater sightings have been on the increase: pushed northwards by climate change, these exotic birds will likely become established visitors to our shores, and thanks to partnerships like this one with Cemex we can provide the right habitats to accommodate them.”

    Bee-eaters are a schedule 1 species, which means that intentional or reckless disturbance of their nests is a criminal offence. RSPB volunteers have been deployed to monitor and protect the nest sites.

    Car parking costs £5 (50% of proceeds going to RSPB, 50% to the farmer). Please park only in the designated area, and note there is strictly no access to the quarry.

  • Research on tropical forests and solutions towards their conservation wins RSPB Conservation Science Award for an outstanding PhD

    Guest blog by Dr Jake Bicknell, University of Kent

    I am the proud winner of the 2017 RSPB Conservation Science Award for an outstanding PhD. It is, of course, a real honour to have my work recognised in this way, and I am thankful to my supervisors and everyone at the Durrell Institute for Conservation and Ecology (DICE)  as well as the judges.

    Photo: Dr Jake Bicknell was presented with the 2017 RSPB Conservation Science Award for an outstanding PhD (photo by Chiara Ceci)

    I would like to think that an important reason that my research was awarded, was because of its applied focus. I am a strong believer of evidence-based conservation, and it is at the interface between research and conservation management that I believe my work lies. Indeed, this is true of the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, for which I worked a few years before undertaking my PhD. I very much enjoyed my time first as a warden at the UK’s largest colony of Little Terns, and then providing science for a greater understanding of the impacts of gamebirds in the UK.

    My PhD however focused away from the UK, on tropical forests and solutions towards their conservation. Selective logging (where only particular high value trees are removed) is the largest use of tropical forests worldwide, and my research demonstrated that in these forests, logging and wildlife can co-exist. This is made possible with the use of a modern timber harvesting technique called Reduced-Impact Logging, or RIL. RIL employs a number of methods to reduce the damage to forests during logging, including planning efficient logging road networks and sustainable harvest rates, as well as implementing directional felling. In contrast, conventional selective logging is unplanned and often leads to high levels of disturbance resulting in extensive changes in wildlife communities. As demonstrated by my research, under well implemented RIL, wildlife are barely affected. The implications of this are important because globally, an area larger than India has already been allocated to logging, and it is my hope that the evidence produced by my research will give greater impetus to policy makers to enshrine RIL methods in all selective logging operations. As consumers we can also do our part by demanding wood that is RIL certified.


    Photo: A logging road cuts through a forest in Guyana

    I do not however believe that logging areas can be equal to strictly protected areas. One reason for this is that my research also demonstrated that logging operations open-up access to previously difficult-to-reach areas, and with increased access, often follows a cascading barrage of other impacts that ultimately lead to the degradation of forests and their biodiversity. Consequently, the final chapter of my PhD aimed to provide an evidence base for expanding protected areas in tropical forests, with a focus on the country of Guyana. At present just 8% of the country is under protection, yet to meet international commitments, Guyana must more than double that. As such I worked closely with policy makers and other scientists to ensure that the expansion of protected areas in Guyana maximises benefits for biodiversity. I’m pleased to say that the research is now being used to define the locations of new protected areas in the country.


    Photo: Tropical forest in Guyana

    Today I continue my work on tropical forests, now with a focus on improving prospects for biodiversity conservation in landscapes dedicated to producing palm oil. Like logging, this represents a major challenge for biodiversity conservation, but as in the case of RIL, I am optimistic that there is substantial scope for improvement. You can read more about this work here.
    I hope that the story of my PhD has emphasised the need for applied conservation research, and with that I salute the RSPB Centre for Conservation Science, and I am deeply thankful for this award.