May, 2014

Our work

Our work
You might be surprised to read that our work is far broader than nature reserves and Big Garden Birdwatch. Read more about what else we do.

Climate change

News and views from the RSPB on climate change and what you can do about it.
  • Dartford Warblers on the move...

    Did you see the RSPB's Dr Richard Bradbury on Countryfile on Sunday night? He was talking to presenter Tom Heap about Dartford warblers and other species whose ranges are moving as a result of climate change. Never fear if you didn't manage to catch it, there's still time to view the show on BBC iPlayer:

    countryfile lee valley

    Are you beginning to see symptoms of climate change in your parts of the country? Do let us know...

  • Going all out for shale threatens our countryside

    Today a Committee of Lords have warned that fracking won’t take off in the UK any time soon unless  ministers take urgent action to cut red tape and convince the public to support fracking. The report concludes that most risks to the environment are “unfounded” and that Government should take decisive measures to quicken the pace of development of this new industry, principally by streamlining regulations that are in place to protect the environment.

    Earlier this year the RSPB and a range of countryside conservation organisations published a comprehensive review of the risks that fracking poses to wildlife and the countryside and put forward 10 recommendations to address them. Given this is a new industry with new and significant risks to the natural environment we concluded that the focus should be on ensuring that regulation of the industry is fit-for-purpose.

    Our principle recommendation was that fracking licenses should not be issued for special places like protected areas and national parks. We have yet to get a serious response to this recommendation and it was not even considered in today’s report. In fact, the Lords’ report does not even consider many of the risks we highlighted, and of our ten recommendations only three are dealt with. One – the idea that all shale gas developments should be required to do an environmental impacts assessment - was not supported, and the other two were only partially backed.

    A shale gas industry in the UK would be unlike any existing industry in terms of its infrastructure requirements: many wellpads at regular intervals throughout the countryside where shale gas resources exist. Each of these sites would pose a risk to the environment, and cumulatively this risk could be substantial. That’s why the debate about the future of this industry is as much about the future of our countryside and our climate as it is about energy.

    Our report asked whether this country was ‘fit to frack’ given what we know about the risks and how the industry is being regulated. Our conclusion was that we are not, and that big improvements needed to be made. Going all out for shale by streamlining regulations and forcing development through would only reinforce this position.

    Take action now and ask Government to protect special places from fracking

  • What lies beneath the rainforest?

    Guest blog Matt WilliamsOrangutan Tropical Peatland Project 

    I’m writing this with a backing track of singing gibbons and the curt electric buzz of van Hasselt’s sunbirds. My desk is in an office in a wooden building with a corrugated metal roof, which makes a musical din when it rains – and it usually pours most nights.  I’m at the northern edge of the Sabangau rainforest in Central Kalimantan, Indonesian Borneo.

    To the south of me are 60,000 square kilometres of tropical peat-swamp forest. This is Borneo’s largest remaining peat-swamp forest and it’s home to the world’s largest population of orangutans, as well as a huge range of bird species, from wrinkled hornbills to the internationally Endangered Storm’s stork, of which only 500 remain globally.

    Photo: Matt Adam Williams/OuTrop

    While it’s easy to get distracted by the incredible wealth of wildlife that’s to be found here, it’s important to remember that these peat-swamp forests serve another extremely important function, that scientists have only really properly understood in the last few decades, and that isn’t still recognised or valued by everyone. Having worked for the RSPB’s climate change team last year, I am well aware: the peat that lies beneath our feet here, on which the trees grow, above which the orangutans travel and the gibbons swing, is packed full of carbon. It’s estimated that Indonesian peatland store 35,000 megatonnes of carbon.

    That’s around seven times as much as the entire UK emitted in all of 2012. These ancient tropical forests store huge amounts of carbon that, if released, would hugely add to climate change.

    Daily life in Indonesia is not responsible for many greenhouse gas emissions - until you take deforestation and forest fires into account. When the forest and the peat burns the carbon is turned into carbon dioxide and it escapes into the atmosphere in huge quantities. When these emissions are accounted for the country one of the world’s biggest polluters.

    In the area where I live and work forest fires have occurred on many occasions in recent decades. The Orangutan Tropical Peatland Project supports a Community Patrol Team, part of whose work is to patrol for fires and to fight them when they occur.

    And such fires are likely to become more frequent. One consequence of climate change is that we’re likely to have more El Nino years, which have effects on weather the world over. Here in Southeast Asia they mean hotter and drier summers - which means more forest fires, and bad news for forests, their wildlife and the climate.

    Photo: OuTrop

    But not all fires are acts of nature. In some cases, fires are illegally started deliberately as a way of clearing forest and making it available for conversion to oil palm. But it’s not all bad news. Programmes like the UN’s REDD+ are increasingly recognising and rewarding countries like Indonesia for keeping forests intact and the carbon in the ground. In return for money from Norway under the REDD scheme, the Indonesian President imposed a moratorium in 2012 on new forest concessions (for conversion or logging) where there’s peat that’s more than just a couple of metres deep and so particularly important for storing carbon.

    Despite this, abuses continue and the moratorium is ignored in many cases. I'll explore this, and the perversity of replacing forest with oil palm, in my next blog in this two part series

     

    Matt Williams is the Communications Manager for the Orangutan Tropical Peatland Project. You can follow him and find more of his work @mattadamw and mattadamwilliams.co.uk.